Previous Question back to main page Next Question 
 
I don’t want to pay for all the social problems created by unwanted children.

The pro-choice crowd has had over 30 years to weed out all the “unwanted people,” and no one can argue that they’ve been stingy in carrying out the death sentences.  So far, they’ve butchered between 45 and 50 million babies and they continue to kill them at the rate of over 3,000 a day.  Meanwhile, we are asked to ignore the fact that, since this holocaust began, America has suffered huge increases in teen pregnancy, homelessness, hunger, welfare, divorce, poverty, child abuse, spousal abuse, deadbeat dads, gangs, illegal drugs, sexually transmitted diseases, high school drop outs, and the list goes on and on.

The fact is, every single social problem which the pro-choice mob says will get worse if we make abortion illegal, actually became worse after we made abortion legal.  Beyond that, the financial burden of these social problems is overwhelming.  Any way you cut it, the American taxpayer is subsidizing the abortion industry. 

However, let’s say for a moment that instead of getting worse our social problems had been helped by killing babies.  Would that justify it?  Do we really want to be the kind of country that uses child sacrifice as a tool of social engineering?  Is the wholesale slaughter of innocent and defenseless people justified if it solves our problems?  And if that is going to be our attitude, why kill the unborn?  They are the one category of human beings who had nothing to do with creating these problems and whose death would not solve them. 

The bottom line is, as a solution to social problems, abortion is ineffective and morally indefensible.  It is also the ultimate example of selfishness.  For proof, notice that no one ever volunteers to give their own life to solve social problems, they only insist that others do so.

 

 



Survivor Forum Survivor Heros Survivor Nation Pulse Gear Robots Artwork Pro-life Answers Home Page The Wall