|
Some children are forced to lead terrible lives. Isn’t abortion better than that?
In other words, abortion is done out of compassion for the one being
ripped to shreds. Using this perverted logic, slavery could also
be rationalized. From a purely utilitarian standpoint, it could
be argued that a person is better off as a well-cared-for slave in
America, than slowly starving to death in some filthy AIDS-infested
third-world dictatorship.
Also, how do we identify which unborn children will lead these terrible
lives so we don’t inadvertently butcher some who might have lived good
lives? Should only women who promise to give their children
terrible lives be allowed to have them killed?
We also know that a lot of born children already live terrible
lives. So why don’t we start killing them as well? After
all, if it is compassionate to kill people who might live a terrible
life someday in the future, surely it is even more compassionate to
kill people who we know are living terrible lives right now.
|