Allen Cooper
part-time UNM instructor
Daily Lobo via U-Wire, University Wire, U. New Mexico abortion display ignites controversy,2-19-2002
Quote: "I think it's obscene and sensationalist -- you are the American Taliban." (Commenting about a graphic pro-life display of aborted babies by the group: Justice for All, to one of JFA's staff members).
Anna Sampaio
professor of political science at the University of Colorado at Denver
University Wire
Quote: " This goes beyond simply an ideological disagreement. This is obscene, we cannot easily choose to ignore or dismiss these obscene images." (Commenting about a graphic pro-life display on campus showing pictures of aborted babies) .
Anne Ehrlich
biologist, Stanford University
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation
Quote: Ehrlich is on the Advisory Board of: (CAPS): California for Population Stabilization. Although CAPS main concern seems to be immigration in the US, they focus on world-wide population control and give the following groups: Alan Guttmacher Institute, California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARAL), National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as “additional resources” on their website
Barbara Bartman
assistant professor of medicine at George Washington University
Associated Press, Students Learn About Abortion From Pro-Life, Pro-Choice Professors, 3-4-1991
Quote: "After this course, we want you to be able to think a little more critically." (Referring to a course called, The Abortion Controversy).
Barbara Katz Rothman
Professor of Sociology, City University of New York
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement: "The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Barry Commoner
Founder, senior scientist, and director emeritus Center for the Biology of Natural Systems Queens Co
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement: "The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Ben Zuckerman
professor of Physics and Astronomy at UCLA
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation
Quote: Dr. Zuckerman is a longtime environmentalist who has been very involved with the Sierra Club’s population/immigration/environment debate and is an elected member of the Sierra Club’s national board of directors. He is Vice-President of (CAPS): California for Population Stabilization. Although CAPS main concern seems to be immigration in the US, they focus on world-wide population control and give the following groups: Alan Guttmacher Institute , California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARAL) ,National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL) ,Planned Parenthood , Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as “additional resources” on their website.
Carl Djerassi
chemistry professor, Stanford University
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation
Quote: Djerassi is on the Advisory Board of: (CAPS): California for Population Stabilization. Although CAPS main concern seems to be immigration in the US, they focus on world-wide population control and give the following groups: Alan Guttmacher Institute, California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARAL), National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as “additional resources” on their website.
Carole Joffe
Professor of Sociology, University of California
From abortion to contraception: A resource to public policies and reproductive behavior in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the present. Review by S. Marie Harvey, Pro-Choice Forum Medical Abortion in the United States: Politics, Access and Options, By S.M. Harvey, C.A. Sherman, S.T. Bird & J. Warren, January 2003 Pro-choice Forum Website (PCF)
Quote: wrote the Preface for: Understanding Medical Abortion, “The paper advises among other things, recommendations for overcoming barriers to access to medical abortion in the United States.”
Carolyn Merchant
Professor of Environmental History, Philosophy, and Ethics, University of California, Berkele
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement: "The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Carolyn Sharp
Professor of Ethics, Faculty of Theology, St. Paul University Ottawa, Ontario
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement: "The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Catharine MacKinnon
University of Michigan law professor
Chicago Tribune,Voice of history Catharine MacKinnon looks at the long road ahead: 1-6-1992
Quote: "I've never encountered a woman who has had an abortion who does it lightly. Most face that it (the fetus) was alive, and they're thinking about it being dead. Women who have had abortions and had people act like it's a tumor or a kidney or a fingernail feel very sold-out. They often are not ready for how they emotionally respond because they haven't been prepared to deal with that. The only approach out there is that the fetus is a person or a body part, rather than that the fetus is unique in women's experience and entitled to a legal concept of its own that grasps its relation to the pregnant woman. It's important to treat the fetus as a form of life and then ask yourself the question, 'What could justify ending that life?' To me the answer is the inequality of women and men: that women become pregnant under conditions of inequality, through norms, mores and sexual practices that women do not control; through lack of adequate contraception, and through forced sex. When women become mothers, they are not allowed to have the same full lives that fathers are, unless they're very wealthy...Abortion has offered the only way out.If this government acts to take that away from women, it takes away the only island of sex equality in the whole picture."
Charles Weiner
Professor Emeritus, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement: "The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Chuck Pennacchio
pro-choice Philadelphia University of the Arts professor
Salon.com, Casey vs. Santorum: 7-15-2005
Quote: Told reporters that, "because he is pro-choice he’ll oppose Bob Casey Jr. in a Democratic primary."
Daniel C. Maguire
teaches Moral Theology and Ethics at Marquette University in Milwaukee
FT. Lauderdale Sun Sentinel, Religion Notes, 3-25-2005/ ReligiousConsultation.org Website
Quote: On his website: “The Sacred Choices Initiative is a worldwide issues campaign aimed at expanding scholarly and lay perceptions of the positions of the world's religions on contraception and abortion. The goal is to change the international discourse on family planning and open the way to a more informed and humane stance on woman's rights within a religious context. The campaign was organized by a group of international religious scholars from various religions known as The Religious Consultation on Population, Reproductive Health and Ethics. The Consultation is advised by a council of recognized experts on population and health."
Daniel C. Maguire
professor of moral theological ethics at Marquette University in Milwaukee
Ft. Lauderdale Sun Sentinel, Religion Notes, 3-25-2005/ ReligiousConsultation.org Website
Quote: Daniel C. Maguire, is a president of the Religious Consultation on Population, Reproductive Health and Ethics, he participated in a Planned Parenthood of South Palm Beach and Broward Counties Inc. sponsored town hall forum. Maguire spoke about how Catholics can support both faith and pro-choice decisions.
Daniel C. Maguire
professor of moral theological ethics at Marquette University in Milwaukee
Ft. Lauderdale Sun Sentinel, Religion Notes, 3-25-2005/ ReligiousConsultation.org Website
Quote: Dr.Maguire's is president of the The Religious Consultation on Population, Reproductive Health & Ethics, here is what they believe as posted on his website, “The Religious Consultation (TRC) is an international, multi-faith network of progressive feminist religious scholars and leaders. We seek out the positive, renewable moral energies of our faith traditions, directing them to the issues of population, consumption, ecology, reproductive health and the empowerment of women.”
Daniel C. Maguire
professor of moral theological ethics at Marquette University in Milwaukee
Ft. Lauderdale Sun Sentinel, Religion Notes, 3-25-2005/ ReligiousConsultation.org Website
Quote: “These Rightists are unimpressed with the fact that 94% of Americans consider contraception a moral act. They ignore the fact that Emergency Contraception prevents unwanted pregnancies and thus prevents abortion. Still, the Religious right doesn’t like it, and, fascists that they are, they want to prevent all American women from using it.”
Daniel C. Maguire
professor of moral theological ethics at Marquette University in Milwaukee
Ft. Lauderdale Sun Sentinel, Religion Notes, 3-25-2005/ ReligiousConsultation.org Website
Quote: " …There are many life values, and sometimes other life values supersede the value of a fetus. Cases from real life speak louder than books…What it comes down to is this: if a woman is pregnant and wants to terminate that pregnancy for good medical, psychological, economic, or other reasons, should we force her to stay pregnant?"
David Fergusson
professor,researcher
Uninformed Consent: Abortion and Mental Health Consequences by Warren Throckmorton, PhD: 1-16-2006
Quote: Fergusson is politically pro-choice and was the lead author of the 2006 New Zealand study that shows that women can suffer detrimental emotional affects after an abortion. Fergusson was asked about Planned Parenthood’s position that implies that women are safer psychologically after an abortion than after childbirth. Dr. Fergusson replied that the Planned Parenthood information “is both sparse and disappointing in its presentation. Women need to be advised that compared to women who give birth, those having abortions appear to have a moderate increase in rates of later mental health problems.” He went on to state, "While abortion is likely to mitigate some of the adverse consequences of unplanned pregnancies, including educational disadvantage, reduced income and welfare dependence, there is no clear evidence of mental health benefits.”
David P. Barash
professor of psychology at the University of Washington
LA Times Editorial, Hurray for monkey-man!7-17-2006
Quote: "Of course, the very idea of ancestral human beings and chimpanzees "exchanging genes" makes people squirm, because (let's face it) this means sexual intercourse between our ancient human and animal ancestors. It is hard enough to contemplate our parents copulating; to think of our very great-grandparents not only descended from "monkeys" but having sex with them is difficult to conceive. But conceive is what they evidently did.
There is, however, an even greater source of discomfort at work here; not simple squeamishness about sex but a deeper repugnance that goes to the heart of why so many Americans continue to be so resistant to the theory of evolution. And this is why I not only welcome the news that humans and chimpanzees commingled genes in the past, I also look forward to the possibility that, thanks to advances in reproductive technology, there will be hybrids, or some other mixed human-animal genetic composite, in our future.
David Winickoff
Assistant Professor of Bioethics and Society, University of California, Berkeley
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Dawn Johnsen
professor of constitutional law at Indiana University and former legal director at NARAL Pro-Choice
Washington Times, Nation; Inside Politics; Pg. A06, 12-13-2005
Quote: " It is difficult to imagine stronger evidence of a nominee's legal views on Roe v. Wade' than these memos… But if opponents can't generate full-scale resistance to Alito - at a time when nearly two-thirds of Americans tell pollsters they don't want Roe overturned - Bush and his successors may conclude they can risk more ideologically aggressive nominees, so long as the public considers them qualified."
Dean of a major law school
Village Voice: Partisan View, 1-27-2000
Quote: responded to the comment regarding the hiring of pro-life professors, she stated that , "she would be reluctant to hire a pro-life professor" because she said "she would worry about the willingness of her faculty to interact with a pro-life professor."
Deborah Evind
director of the Women's Resource Center at Portland Community College (PCC)
FeministCampus.org
Quote: She encourages young adults at PCC to get active with the Feminist Majority Leadership Alliance. She helped PCC send large delegations to the March for Women's Lives in 2004 (A march in support of abortion rights) and the National Collegiate Global Women's and Human Rights Conference in 2005
Diana Hull
member of the University of California at Santa Barbara Foundation Board of Trustees (emeritus)
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation: , The Unspoken Word in the Environmentalist Vocabulary ,By Diana Hull, Ph.D., CAPS President: Caps Website, April 2005
Quote: “It’s undeniable: at the root of all environmental issues is overpopulation.” Diana Hull, Ph.D., President: was a founding member of both the Media Division and the Health Division of the American Psychological Association and is a member of the University of California at Santa Barbara Foundation Board of Trustees (emeritus). She a former member of the Sierra Club’s Population Committee and the Southern California Demographic Forum. She is a President of (CAPS): California for Population Stabilization. Although CAPS main concern seems to be immigration in the US, they focus on world-wide population control and give the following groups: Alan Guttmacher Institute, California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARAL), National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as “additional resources” on their website.
Eleanor Lee
University of Kent, School for Social Policy: Lecturer in Social Policy
Eleanor Lee Website
Quote: Lee makes this statement on her website: “I am a member of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, and I am a member of the publications advisory board for the US-based reproductive health research institute, The Alan Guttmacher Institute. In my spare time, I co-ordinate the work of Pro-Choice Forum.” (Alan Guttmacher is the research arm of Planned Parenthood).
Elizabeth Cavendish
assistant professor at the University of Illinois College of Law
NARAL: website/ NARAL Press Release 7-21-2004
Quote: made this comment regarding President Bush’s Court nominees: "This administration has shown that it will go to any length, violate any rule, and upset any precedent to pack the courts with anti-choice extremists. We must not allow these dangerous ideologues to make rulings over women’s reproductive rights and fundamental freedoms for a generation to come.” Elizabeth Cavendish is one of the leaders of the pro-choice movement and became interim president of NARAL Pro-Choice America on May 1, 2004. Prior to this she served as an Assistant Professor at the University of Illinois College of Law.
Elizabeth Ettorre
professor of Sociology, Associate Dean of Research and Enterprise
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Ellie Lee
teaches social policy at the University of Kent
Spiked: Channel 4's forthcoming documentary showing pictures of dead fetuses has more to do with the yuk factor than the abortion debate by Ellie Lee, 4-8-2004
Quote: “ What the abortion debate needs is clear explanation of why it is right that women have reproductive choices; why abortion is a solution to a problem for women with unwanted pregnancies; and why this remains the case for women who seek abortion later in pregnancies, as well as earlier on, despite the fact that the fetus is then more developed biologically.” Lee is the author of Abortion, Motherhood and Mental Health: Medicalising Reproduction in the United States and Great Britain.
Erwin Chemerinsky
professor at Duke University Law School
Washington Post, Alito Confirmation Battles Shapes Up: Online Transcript: 11-2-2005, 2:00PM
Quote: "For a century, the Court has protected a fundamental right to privacy even though it is not mentioned in the Constitution. I believe an aspect of this privacy is the right of the woman to choose whether to end her pregnancy. I think Roe v. Wade got it exactly right.”
Erwin Chemerinsky
Duke law professor
Independent Weekly, Will RICO injunctions be allowed?
Quote: Chemerinsky has defended the national Organization for Women (NOW) concerning their loosing battle to bring RICO law suites against pro-life demonstrators, "Really what the case is about is that whether NOW and the clinics are going to be able to keep the injunction," Chemerinsky says pro-life groups "are engaged in a concerted national campaign of violence against reproductive health clinics and this is a way of dealing with it."
Evelyne Shuster
Head of Ethics and Human Rights Program, Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Adjunct Assoc
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Felicia Stewart
UCSF professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences
SF Chronicle, Pro-choice leader makes public appeal to conservatives: 3-11-2005
Quote: said abortion rights advocates in recent years may have lost ground with voters by being too reluctant to publicly discuss their own moral values. "We need to get over it. We need to talk about moral values,'' she said, adding that the matter of advocating for safe and legal abortion, reproductive rights and birth control for women -- particularly poor women in developing countries -- is "a deeply moral undertaking'' because it ensures that more women have healthy children that they are capable of caring for.”
Fred Mirarchi
assistant clinical professor of emergency medicine at Drexel University College of Medicine in Phila
National Review Online, The Corner: 3-19-2005
Quote: Made this statement referring to the Terri Schiavo case “The process of starving to death seems very barbaric but in actuality is very peaceful.”
Gary L. Francione
professor of Animal Rights and the Law at Rutgers University School of Law
Abortion and Animal Rights: are they comparable issues? By: Gary L. Francione/ Animal Rights Commentaries Thursday, April 18, 1996: Abortion and Animal Rights By: Gary L. Francione
Quote: "I am frequently asked about the relationship between the animal rights viewpoint and the matter of abortion. These questions are usually posed by people who think that if someone believes that at least some nonhuman animals have rights, they must also believe that fetuses have rights and that abortion should be viewed as in the same moral category as animal exploitation. This view of the relationship between animal rights and abortion rests on a misunderstanding of the animal rights position.. First, it is wrong to assume that fetuses have rights just because some animals do.So, it does not follow that if some animals have rights, then fetuses have rights. Human fetuses and normal, adult mammals, human or nonhuman, are simply different. You may regard fetuses as different because you believe that humans are "superior" or that fetuses possess "souls," but such views are, of course, grounded in theological notions.."
Gary L. Francione
professor of Animal Rights and the Law at Rutgers University School of Law
Abortion and Animal Rights: are they comparable issues? By: Gary L. Francione/ Animal Rights Commentaries Thursday, April 18, 1996: Abortion and Animal Rights By: Gary L. Francione
Quote: "I also argued that abortion presents a unique moral dilemma in that, even if we accept that fetuses have rights, the conflict is between the primary rightholder--the woman--and the subservient rightholder who resides in her body. In these circumstances, someone must resolve the conflict, and if that task is relegated to the state, the task of fetal protection can be accomplished only through the state's literal entry into the body of the primary rightholder."
George Sessions
professor, Sierra College
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation
Quote: Sessions is on the Advisory Board of: (CAPS): California for Population Stabilization. Although CAPS main concern seems to be immigration in the US, they focus on world-wide population control and give the following groups: Alan Guttmacher Institute, California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARAL), National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as “additional resources” on their website.
Hank Greely
Stanford Law school professor
SF Chronicle, Pro-choice leader makes public appeal to conservatives: 3-11-2005 and 3-4-2004
Quote: said this at the NARAL “10th Power of Choice” Luncheon, "We've got to convince people that it's about morals on both sides. This movement is about respect for someone's choices'' and noted that abortion "can be an affirmatively moral choice''.
Hans Kung
Professor of Ecumenical Theology ,University of Tübingen, Germany
http://www.population-security.org/index.html#02, The life and death of NSSM 200,How the Destruction of Political Will Doomed a U.S. Population Policy, by Stephen D. Mumford
Quote: Gave this review of a book on population control "This book gives extremely helpful background information about the hidden coordination of Vatican and American policy with regard to population growth and birth control. It is high time that certain problematic maneuvers of the Vatican are discussed in public."
Hazel Biggs
lecturer in law and Director of Medical Law at the University of Kent
ProChoice Forum: People
Quote: The pro-choice forum described her this way, "Much of Biggs’ research centres on pro-choice arguments and their impact on decision-making at the beginning and the end of life. She has published and lectured extensively on reproductive choice, feminist legal theory and end of life issues. She believes that abortion law and ethics are presently inseparable but that raising awareness of the tensions between the limitations of the present legal position and the constraints it generates will expose the potential for legal reform."
Henry Mayer
Clinical professor of medicine at Stanford University’s Medical School
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation
Quote: He also serves on the board of directors of San Mateo County Planned Parenthood and is a member of the Environmental Health Committee, Physicians for Choice, and California Medical Association. Dr. Mayer produced numerous documentary films including “Tomorrow’s Children,” which deals with the world population crisis.
Herman Schwartz
American University law professor
NARAL Press Release 7-21-2004
Quote: “President Bush has nominated the most ideologically rigid group of judges ever to the federal bench.” Schwartz is also author of: Right-Wing Justice, The Conservative Campaign to take Over the Courts (2004)
Hortensia Amaro
professor of Health Sciences in Bouve College a Northeastern University
Pro-choice Forum Website (PCF)
Quote: She is in the Advisory Group for the pro-choice Forum.
Ida Dupont
professor of Criminal Justice at Pace University in New York
Interview posted on: Gothamist.com: 12-1-2004, Interview by Raphie Frank
Quote: “ Working at the abortion clinic was quite an experience! I was a counselor at the clinic. Everyone had to speak to a counselor to explain the procedure to them and to advise them about birth control and answer any of their questions if they had any. I heard so many sad stories about why women had decided to have abortions. I had to cross a picket line to get to work and there was an anti-choice protester that used to harass all of us when we entered the clinic. ..The second trimester abortions were hard for me to deal with because they are admittedly a bit gory…I remember witnessing one of these procedures and being disturbed at the sight of parts of a fetus being removed.”
Ignacio Chapela
Assistant Professor, Microbial Ecology, University of California, Berkeley
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Iris Litt
The Professor of Pediatrics, Stanford University
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
James Lindgren
professor of law at Northwestern University
Village Voice, Partisan Review, 1-27-2000
Quote: ''Many of the groups most likely to be pro-life in the general population--Republicans, Hispanics, and Catholics--are among the most underrepresented groups in law teaching. Compared to the full-time working population, Republicans are at 32 percent of parity, Hispanics at 31 percent and Catholics at 53 percent.''
Janet Holmgren
Mills College President and a chair of the National Council for Research on Women
SF Chronicle, Pro-choice leader makes public appeal to conservatives: 3-11-2005 and 3-4-2004
Quote: She participated in the NARAL “10th Power of Choice” Luncheon. She said that while many young women today "do have a concern about being labeled pro-abortion,'' they may also take for granted rights they've grown up with -- including readily accessible birth control and reproductive services. "It really is a question of funding more messages'' to get that across, she said.
Jeff Jarvis
associate professor ,City University of New York’s new Graduate School of Journalism
BuzzMachine.com
Quote: made this comment on his website; “I am a liberal: a centrist leaning left. I have voted for Democrats in most elections. I am pro-choice, though have no idea what I would do if faced with that choice myself…I am in favor of government funding for research, including stem-cell research.”
John Brannian
reproductive specialist at the University of South Dakota medical school
Aberdeen American News (South Dakota), Scholars eye abortion proposal, 2-16-2004
Quote: said that when life begins is "a very complex" question. "It is a personal opinion, As a cell divides after conception, each new cell has the genetic capacity to form a complete human being,” he also said. "By that rationale, are we then to accept each one of those cells as an individual human being?"
Jonathan Siger
University of Florida campus Rabbi
Independent Florida Alligator, Photos protest abortion: 3-9-2006
Quote: told the newspaper that he believes that comparing genocide to abortion is a false analogy. "Last time I checked, there is not a great fetus civilization or race of fetuses."
Jonathan Turley
Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University
USA Today, A parent's right to know: 12-6-2005
Quote: “Pro-choice advocates would make abortion the only absolute right in our Constitution, even though it was not fully recognized by the Supreme Court until 1973. Conversely, parental rights have been recognized since the founding of our Republic but are routinely dismissed when they collide with the almighty right to an abortion. As a pro-choice law professor, I was astonished to find myself on opposite sides with groups such as the ACLU when I helped draft Florida's parental notice amendment to its constitution. In Florida, a child could not get a tattoo or take an aspirin in school without parental consent, but any 12-year-old could walk into a clinic and demand an abortion without notifying her parents of a major medical procedure.”
Julie Fagan
associate professor of medicine at UW-Madison and on the board of NARAL Pro-Choice Wisconsin
The Capital Times (Madison, Wisconsin), Plan B can be out of reach in Wisconsin, 11-1-2005
Quote: Fagan, who practices internal medicine at the University of Wisconsin Women's Health Center said, “I was pretty shocked at the number of pharmacies that didn't carry or didn't know about the morning-after pill, there's a lot of education that needs to go on out there."
Kenneth C. Edelin
professor of obstetrics and gynecology and an associate dean at Boston University School of Medicine
PPFA/ Boston Globe African-American men for women's rights By Kenneth C. Edelin: 5-1-2004
Quote: Edelin was also chairman of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America and chair elect of NARAL Pro-Choice America. Edelin said recently, “We knew that when abortion is illegal, it is African-American women -- especially young black women -- who suffer most, who are injured by illegal abortions and who die from them. We cannot let our government turn back the clock so that woman, especially black women, are hurt and die.”
Lesley Hoggart
Senior Research Fellow at the Policy Studies Institute
ProChoice Forum: People
Quote: Hoggart's research interests include feminist political action and the politics of reproductive choice: and young people's sexual behavior and reproductive decision-making. She studied for her doctoral degree, on the social policy and politics of birth control and abortion in Britain, at Goldsmiths College. She has since written a number of articles on feminist campaigns for reproductive choice, teenage pregnancy and young people's sexual decision-making.
Lila Corwin Berman
professor of religious studies and Jewish studies, Penn State University
University Wire, Spirituality remains part of student life: 4-28-2005
Quote: said not all religious people are conservative. "Plenty of people in religious communities consider themselves pro-choice and are supportive of gay marriage."
Linda Eads
pro-choice law professor at Southern Methodist University
Newsweek, In the Eye Of the Storm:5-30-2005
Quote: Speaking of the Pricilla Owens US Supreme Court nomination, "What she did was well within what judges do."
Linda J Beckman
Professor, California School of Professional Psychology
We Cannot Be Silent about the Misleading “Silent No More” Campaign, By Linda J. Beckman, Ph.D. January 3, 2003: Pro-choice Forum Website (PCF)
Quote: Beckman is an action editor of the pro-choice forum: “…Millions of U.S. women and their providers can attest to the fact that abortion is a safe and generally beneficial procedure. We also know undeniably that abortion is safer and less stressful for women when it is legal, readily available, and can be accessed without harassment from antiabortion picketers.” And, “I do not deny that some women, most usually those with preexisting psychological and emotional problems and/or ambivalence about having an abortion, can be psychologically harmed by the abortion”
Lois Murphy
adjunct professor at Temple University's School of Law
Source, Lois Murphy for Congress, website/ Emily’s List: Candidate Spotlight: Lois Murphy, September 2004
Quote: “I’m a mother, a wife, a law professor, a lawyer, an advocate, a volunteer … I’ve fought for women’s rights and reproductive freedom…” Murphy has also served as president and as a board member of NARAL Pro-Choice Pennsylvania. Lois is a trustee of the Women's Law Project and was appointed in 2003 by Governor Rendell to the Pennsylvania Commission for Women.
Lucinda M. Finley
University at Buffalo law professor
Buffalo News, Seeking common ground: 11-20-2004
Quote: was cited by the news as being, " so pro-choice that her views translate into a deep distrust of the president -- leading her to vote for John F. Kerry."
Lucinda M. Finley
pro-choice law professor and vice provost for faculty affairs at UB
Buffalo News, Local opinion is split on Miers: 10-24-2005
Quote: Commenting on the Miers Supreme Court Nomination, "I wouldn't be at all surprised if the nomination gets withdrawn, But I wouldn't be surprised, either, if Bush digs in his heels on this."
Marc Spindelman
visiting professor of law at Georgetown University who specializes in bioethics
National Review Online, The Corner: 3-19-2005
Quote: said this Regarding Terri Schiavo case: "What's next? If Congress doesn't like it, are they going to subpoena individual women to testify before Congress in order to keep them from exercising their rights to an abortion? What about individuals who want to terminate a respirator? Is Congress going to bring them in and start asking them questions? Who couldn't be dissuaded from exercising their constitutional rights in certain ways in the face of a federal subpoena? The spectacle of this--it's unbelievable."
Marlene Gerber Fried
professor at Hampshire College
Conscience Magazine , The Economics of Abortion Access in the US , Restrictions on Government Funding For Abortion is the Post-Roe Battleground By Marlen Gerber Fried : Winter 2005-2006
Quote: Fried is also the director of the Civil Liberties and Public Policy Program, and founding president of the National Network of Abortion Funds. She recently co-authored Undivided Rights: Women of Color Organizing for Reproductive Justice and co-authored the section on abortion for the recently updated Our Bodies, Ourselves: A New Edition for a New Era.
Marlene Gerber Fried
professor of Philosophy at Hampshire College
National Council for Research on Women, speaker biographies
Quote: she is also the Director of the Civil Liberties and Public Policy Program -- a program for reproductive rights education and activism. She is a long-time reproductive rights activist, was the founding president and continues to serve on the board of the National Network of Abortion Funds, and is on the board of the Abortion Access Project. She has worked on abortion access internationally on the board of the Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights and through the Johannesburg Initiative, an international abortion access and advocacy project. She has spoken and written extensively on abortion rights and access.
Melissa Divine
Kansas State U, instructor in women's studies
Kansas State Collegian via U-Wire University Wire, Pro-life display creates discussion, tension at Kansas State U., 10-25-2005
Quote: said this in response to the Justice For All , pro-life display of graphic images of aborted babies, although she did not support the group, she supports free speech on campus. "I can't do that unless I'm willing to support all speech even speech that I find reprehensible."
Mia Semingson
photography instructor at Colorado University
Colorado Daily via U-Wire University Wire, Graphic display spurs abortion debate,4-19-2005
Quote: said this about a pro-life display by the group, Justice for all, “the display is obscene and especially cruel toward women who chose to have an abortion. It's important for women to make choices in their lives about something that may have happened out of their control. This is something I believe deep down, even after having a baby."
Michael C. Dorf
Columbia University law school professor
Aberdeen American News (South Dakota), Scholars eye abortion proposal, 2-16-2004
Quote: Dorf describes himself as pro-choice, said “…there is a clear line of Supreme Court decisions since Roe in 1973 that have found anti-abortion laws to be unconstitutional.”
Michele C. Curtis
associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at UT-Houston medical school
Houston Press, LP, Houston Press Go, Baby, Go Behind the barricades with the Pro-Life Cougars and their dead-fetus pictures (Texas), 10-2-2003
Quote: "One thing that's misinformative and misleading is the health effects of abortion."
Nancy Felipe Russo
Regents Professor of Psychology and Women's Studies at Arizona State University (ASU).
Pro-choice Forum Website (PCF)
Quote: She is an Action editor of the Pro-Choice Forum, and she is a member of APA's Task Force on Post Abortion Emotional Responses, the APA takes a clear position of supporting a women’s right to an abortion.
Nancy Press
Professor, Oregon Health and Science University
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Otis L. Graham, Jr.
professor Emeritus at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and currently a Visiting Scholar
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation
Quote: He is Board Member of (CAPS): California for Population Stabilization. Although CAPS main concern seems to be immigration in the US, they focus on world-wide population control and give the following groups: Alan Guttmacher Institute, California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARAL), National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as “additional resources” on their website.
Pamela Bridgewater
professor of Law at Washington College of Law
http://www.wcl.american.edu/gender/wilp/faculty.cfm
Quote: she teaches Property, Wills and Trusts, and Reproduction and the Law. She is also a lawyer and reproductive rights advocate/activist and has been involved in abortion clinic defense and the women's health movement for many years.
Pamela D. Bridgewater
Professor, American University, Washington College of Law
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Pat Gott
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point English professor
The Stevens Point Journal (Wisconsin), Groups work to stop sex assaults: 4-27-2005
Quote: Gott is also the faculty adviser to UWSP's Women's Resource Center and Pro-Choice alliance.
Paul Finkelman
University of Tulsa law professor
Aberdeen American News (South Dakota), Scholars eye abortion proposal, 2-16-2004
Quote: Finkelman is also an author of A March to Liberty: Constitutional History of the United States. "This court is not going to overturn Roe. I don't think the votes are there. Even if the emotional sentiment is there, say Justice O'Connor and Justice Kennedy, I think they realize the political firestorm of overturning Roe would be catastrophic to the conservative position. Conservatives would get buried in the next election. Every suburban mom would be out voting."
Paul R. Billings
UC Berkeley, Chair, Council for Responsible Genetics
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Paul Sachdev
pro - choice professor of social work at Memorial University in St. John's Newfoundland
Canadian Business and Current Affairs, Western Report, Hag-ridden by post-abortion guilt: 10-04-1993
Quote: "I know some people argue that a woman should make a decision based on everything available, that she should make an informed choice. But scientists have been given these pictures and they can't decide where life begins. The Supreme Court of Canada cannot even decide unanimously based on these pictures. Why show them to women when it will just upset them?"
Peter Irons
professor of political science at the University of California-San Diego
Aberdeen American News (South Dakota Scholars eye abortion proposal, 2-16-2004
Quote: Irons is also author of A People's History of the Supreme Court, said the justices declined in the Webster case in 1989 to specifically address a Missouri law's statement that life begins at conception."They sidestepped that issue, but I'm pretty confident the court would rule exactly the same way in a case that presented the same issue. I don't think they would go back. The first thing is a judge would throw it out as inconsistent with (the Casey decision). Any statute that does not have a health exception would be tossed out. My guess is that any federal court would toss it out on its face as unconstitutional. Even if the state appealed, I don't think the Supreme Court would accept to hear it. And even if they did, I don't think they would rule on the preamble (the findings that life begins at conception).”
Peter Singer
Professor:Bioethics at Princeton University and Philosophy, University of Melbourne
Jewish World Review / Oct. 28, 1998 / 8 Mar-Cheshvan, 5759, Professor Death will fit right in at Princeton, by Don Feder / Wikipedia, the free online encyclopedia
Quote: "That a being is a human being, in the sense of a member of species Homo Sapiens, is not relevant to the wrongness of killing it. It is, rather, characteristics like rationality, autonomy and self-consciousness that make a difference." In the 1970s, as the leading theoretician of animal rights, Singer coined the term "speciesism" for anyone so narrow-minded as to, "allow the interest of his species to override the greater interest of members of other species". Singer holds that the right to physical integrity is grounded in a being's ability to suffer, and the right to life is grounded in the ability to plan and anticipate one's future. Since the unborn, infants, and severely disabled people lack the ability to plan and anticipate their future, he states that abortion, infanticide, and euthanasia can be justified in certain special circumstances, for instance in the case of severely disabled infants whose life would cause suffering both to themselves and to their parents.
Peter Singer
professor, speaker, animal rights activist
Seattle Post-Intelligencer, The abortion debate that wasn't: 7-17-2005
Quote: "It does not seem quite wise to increase any further draining of limited resources by increasing the number of children with impairments."
Peter Singer
professor, speaker
Peter Singer Website: FAQ
Quote: "If you want to do something more directly related to population issues, you could give to organizations like the International Planned Parenthood Federation or DKT International."
Peter Singer
professor, speaker
princeton.edu- Psinger-FAQ
Quote: Question to Singer, "If you had to save either a human being or a mouse from a fire, with no time to save them both, wouldn’t you save the human being?"
Answer by Singer, " Yes, in almost all cases I would save the human being. But not because the human being is human, that is, a member of the species Homo sapiens. Species membership alone isn't morally significant, but equal consideration for similar interests allows different consideration for different interests. The qualities that are ethically significant are, firstly, a capacity to experience something -- that is, a capacity to feel pain, or to have any kind of feelings. That's really basic, and it’s something that a mouse shares with us. But when it comes to a question of taking life, or allowing life to end, it matters whether a being is the kind of being who can see that he or she actually has a life -- that is, can see that he or she is the same being who exists now, who existed in the past, and who will exist in the future. Such a being has more to lose than a being incapable of understand this.
Any normal human being past infancy will have such a sense of existing over time. I’m not sure that mice do, and if they do, their time frame is probably much more limited. So normally, the death of a human being is a greater loss to the human than the death of a mouse is to the mouse – for the human, it cuts off plans for the distant future, for example, but not in the case of the mouse. And we can add to that the greater extent of grief and distress that, in most cases, the family of the human being will experience, as compared with the family of the mouse (although we should not forget that animals, especially mammals and birds, can have close ties to their offspring and mates).
That’s why, in general, it would be right to save the human, and not the mouse, from the burning building, if one could not save both. But this depends on the qualities and characteristics that the human being has. If, for example, the human being had suffered brain damage so severe as to be in an irreversible state of unconsciousness, then it might not be better to save the human"
Peter Singer
professor, speaker, animal rights activist
princeton.edu: psinger, FAQ
Quote: Question, " I've heard about the possibility of growing meat in a laboratory, just by cells reproducing. Should this lab reared meat prove ecologically safe, cost and energy efficient and safe for human consumption, is this an ethically acceptable way in which animal meat can be developed and consumed? To avoid discrimination on speciesist grounds, providing the meat can be sufficiently engineered for safe human consumption taking into account the accusations aimed at cannibalism, would it be required that laboratories should also grow human meat for consumption?"
Answer, Peter Singer, " Yes, this would be ethically acceptable, because no animals would suffer or die to produce it. There's nothing wrong with meat in itself.
If people prefer the taste of meat grown from the cell of a cow to meat grown from the cell of a human, that's fine too. So there's no ethical requirement to grow human meat for consumption, just because we're growing meat from other animals."
Peter Singer
professor, speaker, animal rights activist
princeton.edu: psinger, FAQ
Quote: "I use the term "person" to refer to a being who is capable of anticipating the future, of having wants and desires for the future. I think that it is generally a greater wrong to kill such a being than it is to kill a being that has no sense of existing over time. Newborn human babies have no sense of their own existence over time. So killing a newborn baby is never equivalent to killing a person, that is, a being who wants to go on living. That doesn’t mean that it is not almost always a terrible thing to do. It is, but that is because most infants are loved and cherished by their parents, and to kill an infant is usually to do a great wrong to its parents."
Peter Singer
professor, speaker, animal rights activist
princeton.edu: psinger, FAQ
Quote: "Sometimes, perhaps because the baby has a serious disability, parents think it better that their newborn infant should die. Many doctors will accept their wishes, to the extent of not giving the baby life-supporting medical treatment. That will often ensure that the baby dies. My view is different from this, only to the extent that if a decision is taken, by the parents and doctors, that it is better that a baby should die, I believe it should be possible to carry out that decision, not only by withholding or withdrawing life-support – which can lead to the baby dying slowly from dehydration or from an infection - but also by taking active steps to end the baby’s life swiftly and humanely."
Peter Singer
professor, speaker, animal rights activist
princeton.edu: psinger, FAQ
Quote: When asked if it was wrong to kill a "normal" infant, Singer replies, "Most parents, fortunately, love their children and would be horrified by the idea of killing it. And that’s a good thing, of course. We want to encourage parents to care for their children, and help them to do so. Moreover, although a normal newborn baby has no sense of the future, and therefore is not a person, that does not mean that it is all right to kill such a baby. It only means that the wrong done to the infant is not as great as the wrong that would be done to a person who was killed. But in our society there are many couples who would be very happy to love and care for that child. Hence even if the parents do not want their own child, it would be wrong to kill it."
Ray Warner
retired faculty from the Institute of Technology of the University of Minnesota
Star Tribune: Ray Warner: A Growing threat we can’t ignore: 11-8-2005
Quote: “ Our Mantra should be, Two children are enough.”
Robert Hansen
Professor of Voice and Opera in the Department of Fine Arts at WTA&MU
Planned Parenthood of Amarillo & the Texas Panhandle- online Press release
Quote: Hansen coordinated music for the September 2004: Annual Fall Membership Gala hosted by the Friends of Planned Parenthood.
Rosalind Petchesky
professor of political science at Hunter College and author of a seminal book on abortion rights
The Village Voice: The Fetal Frontier, Pro-choice advocates wrestle with the uncomfortable, by Sharon Lerner 12-7-2004
Quote: points out that many who get abortions after the first trimester are young teenagers who didn't act earlier because of the climate of fear, shame, and confusion created by anti-abortion extremists.
Ruth Hubbard
Professor Emerita of Biology, Harvard University
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Ruth Roemer
adjunct professor Emerita, UCLA School of Public Health, past president
http://www.population-security.org/index.html#02 The life and death of NSSM 200,How the Destruction of Political Will Doomed a U.S. Population Policy, by Stephen D. Mumford
Quote: Gave this review of a book on population control
"This sobering book raises a grave question: will it be possible to assure the reproductive rights of women and men, internationally recognized for the first time by the landmark 1994 Cairo International Conference on Population and Development? In a well-documented account, Mumford (the book's author) tells how in December 1974 the U.S. government adopted a policy on world population crucial for peace and development; how the policy was concealed in a restricted document (NSSM 200) for 14 years because of political influence by the Catholic Church; and how the Vatican and the Catholic Church have undermined and thwarted implementation of population policy vital for the security of the United States and other nations. Every American should be concerned about this alarming cover-up and subversion of democratic decision-making."
S. Marie Harvey
Director of the Research Program on Women’s Health at the Center for the Study of Women in Society
From abortion to contraception: A resource to public policies and reproductive behavior in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the present. Review by S. Marie Harvey, Pro-Choice Forum Medical Abortion in the United States: Politics, Access and Options, By S.M. Harvey, C.A. Sherman, S.T. Bird & J. Warren, January 2003 Pro-choice Forum Website (PCF)
Quote: Harvey co-authored the paper: Understanding Medical Abortion, The paper advises among other things, recommendations for overcoming barriers to access to medical abortion in the United States.
Sally Jacobsen
Northern Kentucky University
WXIX, Cincinnati,Teacher Responsible For Pulling Down Crosses Forced From Teaching Duties:4-17-2006
Quote: "By leading her students in the destruction of an approved student organization display, Professor Sally Jacobsen's actions were inconsistent with Northern Kentucky University's commitment to free and open debate adn the opportunity for all sides to be heard without threat of censorship or reprisal," stated University president James Vortruba. Jacobsen encouraged her students to pull down a pro-life display and memorial in April of 2006, she was removed from teaching classes and will retire a the end of the semester.
Sally Jacobsen
Northern Kentucky University ,English Professor
WKRC Cincinnati, Professor Apologizes For Tearing Down Display: 4-18-2006
Quote: "No. I don't have any regrets Jacobsen defended leading a group of students to tear down a campus pro-life display that she found offensive." But after several e-mails and letters to the University she told reporters this ."I deeply regret my impulsive action in dismantling that display. I really love NKU and care very much about my students and don't want them to be harmed. It was a mistake of judgment for me to invite my students to participate in that action. At this point, I really want the university to be able to defuse the firestorm of attention around this."
Sally Jacobsen
professor, Northern Kentucky University
The Kentucky Enquirer: destruction of anti-abortion display under investigation: April 2006
Quote: "I did, outside of class during the break, invite students to express their freedom of speech rights to destroy the (pro-life) display if the wished to."
Sarah Weddington
adjunct professor at the University of Texas at Austin's Center for Women’s Studies
The Good Life with Gusto Magazine: Sarah Weddington, The woman behind Roe v. Wade and trailblazer for women's rightsby Michelle Moon Reinhardt/ The 1999 Commencement Address
By Sarah Weddington ,"We Stand Taller Because We Stand on the Shoulders of Others" , Wells College
Quote: “Beginning Roe, we never considered our work to be "for abortion. Rather, we were struggling for the right of women to make decisions relating to pregnancy. To us, those decisions should not be made by strangers or the government.” Weddington was the lawyer who successfully argued the Roe vs. Wade decision to the US Supreme Court. She has been a guest speaker to many college campuses since.
Scott Powe
professor at the University of Texas School of Law
University Wire, Democrats should quit complaining, confirm Alito: 11-4-2005
Quote: calls himself "100 percent pro-choice," said "Roe was terribly reasoned I think there's some requirement under the Constitution that if you cannot explain a decision and its relationship with legal materials, it's not a valid decision."
Shakuntala Ghare
associate professor at Northern Virginia Community College
Washington Post, McDonnell, Deeds in Virtual Tie: 11-9-2005
Quote: said her views on abortion caused her to cast a vote for a pro-choice candidate. "I thought Deeds was more pro-choice for women," she said.
Sheryl Thornburn Bird
Associate Professor in the Department of Public Health at the Oregon State University in Corvallis,
From abortion to contraception: A resource to public policies and reproductive behavior in Central and Eastern Europe from 1917 to the present. Review by S. Marie Harvey, Pro-Choice Forum Medical Abortion in the United States: Politics, Access and Options, By S.M. Harvey, C.A. Sherman, S.T. Bird & J. Warren, January 2003 Pro-choice Forum Website (PCF)
Quote: co-authored: Understanding Medical Abortion. The paper advises among other things, recommendations for overcoming barriers to access to medical abortion in the United States.
Stuart H. Hurlbert
professor of Biology and the Director of Center for Inland Waters at San Diego State University
Cap-s.org website: Family Planning/Board Members / Overpopulation
Quote: Hurlbert is Secretary of (CAPS): California for Population Stabilization. Although CAPS main concern seems to be immigration in the US, they focus on world-wide population control and give the following groups: Alan Guttmacher Institute, California Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARAL), National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League (NARAL), Planned Parenthood, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California as “additional resources” on their website
Susan Pace Hamill
University of Alabama law professor
Christian group objects to tax reformer's abortion stance:3-14-2003
Quote: "As a Christian, I am sensitive to the moral issue of abortion. The Christian Coalition has portrayed me as insensitive. There are a lot of abortions I would find immoral under any circumstances. This is an issue where there is room for disagreement. The law is not the place to work out this moral dilemma. Before Roe vs. Wade, the rich went to New York and the poor died in back alleys. At least if it's legal, you can get the moral issue out in the open.”
Teresa Collett
professor at South Texas College of Law
Village Voice: Partisan View, 1-27-2000
Quote: “I could hold a mini-convention in my hotel room of women law professors who were Christian, pro-life, and Republican.” (Implying that there are only a hand full of pro-life law professors).
Troy Duster
Professor of Sociology, New York University, University of California, Berkeley
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Vicki Michel
Professor of Bio-Ethics and Health Law, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles
Pro-Choice Alliance against Prop 71- website
Quote: Signed this statement:"The undersigned, who are pro-choice and support stem cell research in principle, in consideration of serious fiscal, technical and ethical problems with the ‘California stem cell research and cures initiative’ urge; a ‘no’ vote on proposition 71."
Virginia Abernethy
professor of Psychiatry (Anthropology) Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
http://www.population-security.org/index.html#02, The life and death of NSSM 200,How the Destruction of Political Will Doomed a U.S. Population Policy, by Stephen D. Mumford
Quote: She is also an editor, Population and Environment, and gave this review of a book on population control: "The Roman Catholic Church has been steadfastly opposed to all mechanical or chemical means of birth control. Stephen Mumford brings to bear overwhelming evidence that, from its beginning, the doctrine of Papal infallibility committed the Church to rejecting the reality of a world population crisis and led, indeed, to highly successful efforts to block timely U.S. interventions and responses (including strict immigration control). This is a dramatic expose‚ of the undermining of democratic institutions and political will, in the service of interests antithetical to U.S. population stabilization and the long-term survival of the nation."
William Rashbaum
Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in NY
Mother Jones Magazine/ Voice for Choice
Quote: "The major reason for the economic barriers to abortion is the restrictions on funding through laws and public policies that began soon after Roe v. Wade and continue today. Prohibiting abortion funding by the federal government and the states has been a key target of the antiabortion movement. While its ultimate goal is to make abortions illegal for all women and under all circumstances, the primary strategy has been curtailing access through laws, regulations, executive orders, violence and even murder."
|